June 19, 2007

 

Wisconsin State Capital
Room 20 North
State
Capitol
P.O. Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708

Attn: Terry Moulton, Republican, 68th Assembly District

 

Dear Mr. Moulton,

I am writing to you concerning SB-80, which as you know prohibits certain companies doing business in your state from avoiding their moral duty to their employees and thus codifies an employer/employee relationship. Upon the passage of this bill into law, these companies will no longer be able to treat their employees as subcontractors and the current exploitation of them will, at least from this perspective, be minimized. Although this legislation does not single out any particular company, I am herewith commenting on my personal experiences with The Southwestern Company as being one of the organizations affected. Because it has become glaringly apparent to me as to who this company really is, I can conclude with a reasonable degree of certainty that you have been strongly lobbied to block or otherwise “water down” this legislation.

 

The Southwestern Company is masterful at marketing. To put it in political terms, I am not sure whether they attended the Bill Clinton School of Spin, or whether they assisted in creating it. Let me preface also by saying that up until about a year ago, I considered myself (as well as the other voters in my family) a Republican. I now consider myself a conservative for reasons that, I am sure, you are aware of from a national political standpoint. I really feel like I have no political party that effectively represents my voice. 

 

I am the father of Kristen Rae Spicer. She and I testified before the committee on April 10, 2007 about her experience in the summer of 2005 with The Southwestern Company. As a result of this testimony and as well the information on Kristen Rae’s website (southwesterncompanytruth.com), The Southwestern Company has chosen to threaten a lawsuit against my daughter and me, and has hired a slander/defamation attorney in Atlanta who is well known and who received a lot of publicity when he successfully sued Cox Enterprises over their characterization in the press of Richard Jewell concerning the Atlanta Olympic Park bombing in 1996. So, our negative experience with this company continues as we scrape together the resources to hire our own counsel. Even though the information posted on this site is truthful, I believe it is The Southwestern Company’s plan (and consistent with the opinion of Kristen Rae’s attorney) to make her “disappear”. She nor I have the resources to pay an attorney to allow our truthful testimony to be heard in a court of law. According to Kristen Rae’s attorney, this is a typical tactic of the big guy trying to crush the little guy.

 

In this vein, you need to know that as a result of these threats (and other assertions made by The Southwestern Company in a separate letter to me), I have avoided writing a “Parents Testimonial” that I would allow to be published on Kristen Rae’s website. In any event, we are in contact with Fox News (and other media outlets), and assuming our dialogue continues with them as I have reason to believe it will, it is a good bet that a feature will be produced concerning The Southwestern Company’s tactics and our resultant plight (and those of others) with this organization and the comprehensive negative affects on our young people. You are probably aware of Bill O’Reilly’s passion against the exploitation of young people and his corresponding praise (or otherwise) of those states that implement legislation accordingly. I have no doubt that the state of Wisconsin would be featured as well as a praiseworthy pioneer (or otherwise) in this arena.

 

I encourage you to check out Kristen Rae’s website because you will see a copy of The Southwestern Company’s threatening letter to her. You as well will see the consistency of over 20 independent testimonies published thereon. Her site started with only her own testimony. Since she launched this site after her verbal testimony before the committee in April, 2007, there have been many others similarly affected “coming out of the woodwork”. Sadly, when My wife and I searched the internet before the summer of 2005 as one of the investigatory techniques available to us as a function of making our decision to allow her to go that summer of 2005, we were unable to locate any significant negative information concerning The Southwestern Company. We relied upon the untruthful assertions of Southwestern Company representatives in response to specific questions asked by my wife and me. (For the legal reasons mentioned previously and at the advice of my attorney, I am not able to divulge the details of that conversation in writing at this time). Now, in addition to southwesterncompanytruth.com, there are various other “blogs” or sites on the internet that you can readily locate that are beginning to provide a more balanced perspective of how this company operates. For a truly balanced perspective and with all the “positive spin” sites that have recently been put up on the internet by The Southwestern Company in response to and in an effort to overshadow southwesterncompanytruth.com, another 100 or so sites like Kristen Rae’s need to be put up.

 

I suspect that The Southwestern Company’s political spin machine is or has attempted to assert to you as one in control of moving SB-80 forward that you should have reason to discredit my and my daughter’s testimony before the committee on April 10, 2007. I have no doubt that they have “spun” to you the point that they are suing my daughter and me (amongst other things) for our “malicious lies” before the committee on April 10, 2007, and I have no doubt that some of the inflammatory verbiage chosen in their letter to Kristen Rae was with the understanding that there would be an additional political audience. This spin machine will further assert to the “truthfulness” of these initial assertions by them when they come to you after they have made us “disappear” (for the financial realities stated previously) indicating to you that the reason for such was because they demonstrated that my daughter and I had been lying. They win, you are played, and the situation testifies as to who and what this company really is. We all can then credit ourselves as being the enablers of this company’s tactics, and another “successful” technique being established in The Southwestern Company book of spin, exploitation, and intimidation.

 

Why is The Southwestern Company singling out Kristen Rae’s web site for their law suit, and not all the other sites that are publishing negative testimonials? Like I said, its all politics, and they know that if SB-80 is passed, they cannot operate their business model as currently structured. In this, they must demonstrate to you that my daughter and I are liars and thereby kill SB-80. With SB-80 dead, all they have to do is continue to convince naïve students to work for a net $2.00 per hour (and which they will only learn of well after the fact) and after they are used up and re-deposited back into the work force, parents and other companies having the challenge to fix them from both an emotional and ethical standpoint. This is again testimony as to who The Southwestern Company is. They would rather look elsewhere and continue to exploit the young people rather than look at themselves and change with the times as other successful companies have done, whether it requires revising a business model or a product in this computer and electronic media world. Instead of taking responsibility for the horrific circumstances to which they subject their “subcontractors”, they choose to point the finger elsewhere and accuse people of malicious lying.

 

To think and operate like the spin machine The Southwestern Company is, in apparent negative situations I believe they ask themselves the rhetorical question “How can we make lemon aide out of lemons”. This question would have been particularly appropriate when SB-80 was first introduced. However, the masters of spin that they are, The Southwestern Company takes it one step further and asks itself “how can we manipulate SB-80 so that it creates even a better situation for us than had the bill never been introduced to begin with?” The obvious answer is to appear to be helpful and in support of the spirit of the bill, but by offering an amendment thereto that operates to exempt The Southwestern Company, and thereby distinguishing itself from other “traveling sales crews” where there is not a distinction to begin with. Sound familiar?

 

Mr. Moulton, everybody makes poor decisions. But when you are deceived into making a decision to allow your child to be subjected to the “Southwestern Experience”, this is exploitation of the worst degree. As I testified before the committee, had my and my wife’s questions been truthfully answered, Kristen Rae would not have been permitted to go that summer of 2005. My parental authority was usurped. They are masterful at using the “subcontractor” relationship. The Southwestern Company can legally turn a blind eye to the fact that its subcontractor-managers, if they are at all human and due to the fact that they themselves are also impressionable young persons, will have a natural propensity to lie or distort the truth in an effort to get the “first-years” such as my daughter to sign on, it being all about the numbers and due to the fact that subcontractor-managers can be expected to make more money based on how many “first-years” they get to sign on under them. In this, The Southwestern Company executives can comfortably sit in their ivory towers and pontificate the point that their subcontractor-manager was not “technically” authorized to “lie”, yet all the while taking financial advantage of the lies. What a deal!!!!!

 

Speaking of “blind eyes”, the purported “surprise and shock” of The Southwestern Company as to Kristen Rae’s and my testimony on April 10, 2007 as published in their May 17, 2007 letter to Kristen Rae is either feigned, or if sincere is testimony to their blind eye tactics and passion for excerpting from students’ experiences only the minority of experiences that are positive and ignoring the vast majority of experiences that are negative. For the legal reasons stated previously, I cannot divulge the details of my communication with The Southwestern Company as to the rape of my daughter and the other illegal activity of which they were previously made aware at about the time when the associated criminal complaint was filed.

 

My only regret concerning the April 10, 2007 hearing is that having been taken by emotion at the time, I failed to prompt Kristen Rae at all the necessary occasions during her testimony to insure the Senate committee heard the comprehensive list of offenses and “fallout” concerning that summer from hell. For me personally, my testimony that The Southwestern Company’s representatives’ lies and distortions to specific questions asked by my wife and me operated to usurp my parental authority and prohibited me to make an informed decision whether to allow my daughter to experience the “Southwestern Experience” is a position about which I am passionate.

 

Since “our” initial 2005 experience with The Southwestern Company, the following lists some of the direct damage and fallout:

           

            1. Time, emotion, and expense to file a criminal complaint for the rape of my daughter in            Pennsylvania.

            2. Time, emotion, and expense to file a temporary stalking order against the rapist in Georgia.

            3. Psychiatric counseling of my daughter (18 months)

            4. Psychiatric counseling of my wife and me (12 months)

            4. Prescription of drugs for Kristen Rae calculated by her counselor to enable her to cope with the traumas of the summer from both the “normal” book field experience and the rape as well.       She continues to take this medication and could be on it the rest of her life.

            5. Withdrawal by Kristen Rae from The University of Georgia due to her inability to cope.         She currently has a full time job.

            6. Health problems with my wife.

 

Mr. Moulton, my daughter is not a slouch. The year prior to her 2005 Summer from Hell, graduating from Jackson County Comprehensive High School, she received the Principal and Faculty Award voted on by those by whom it is named, awarded to a single student that displays the highest combined attributes of character, concern for others, concern for community, academics, and extra-curricular activities. So prestigious is this award that the single student receiving it each year is honored by having their name engraved on a plaque for permanent display in the school bookcase. When Kristen Rae was given this award, the principal said "this person always, always, always makes the right decision". She came back after the summer of 2005 a mere shell of a person having been totally dismantled. In April, 2007 when she was requested to testify before the Senate committee was the first time I began to see the old Kristen Rae come back. She being able to speak her truthful voice to insure others are truly fully informed before they make the commitment to subject themselves to the “Southwestern Experience” is as much about her healing as anything else is as she tries to achieve some sense of rightness in her world. Then comes The Southwestern Company again for the final kill!!!

 

This whole situation, sir, is a travesty at a minimum. I humbly request you exhibit both rationality as well as heart when considering moving SB-80 forward.

           

Sincerely,

Guy K. Spicer